China finds 3,600-year-old palace
Chinese archaeologists recently found a palace dating back to about 3,600 years ago at the Erlitou Bronze Age site in Henan province. (December 13, 2011)
It is the best-preserved palace ever found at the site and may be the prototype for places of worship during the Shang dynasty.
In the Erlitou site’s palace area, archaeologists found the rammed-earth foundation of the palace, which has at least three courtyards and covers a total area of more than 2,100 square meters.
The Erlitou site contains cultural relics ranging from the Yangshao and Longshan cultures about 5,000 years ago to the Eastern Zhou and Eastern Han dynasties. The site had its heyday during the Xia dynasty from the 21st to 17th century BC, and the culture created during this period is known as the “Erlitou Culture.”
“The Erlitou palace complex is an amazing discovery, and is the earliest imperial palace in China,” said Xu Hong, head of the archaeological team at the Erlitou site and director of the Department of the Xia-Shang-Zhou Archaeology under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
The palace complex covers a total area of nearly 110,000 square meters and is the oldest of its kind in China.
“Built about 3,700 years ago, the neatly designed palace complex, along with surrounding buildings, forms the center of the ancient capital. Although it is only one-seventh the size of the Imperial Palaces of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the Erlitou palace complex is the prototype of all later imperial palaces in China,” Xu said.
Massive flood may have led to China’s earliest empire
Many cultures trace their origins to the hazy horizon where history meets legend. In China’s case, that blurry line occurs sometime between 2200 B.C.E. and 2000 B.C.E., when a legendary hero named Yu tamed Yellow River flooding and earned a mandate to become the founding emperor of the Xia dynasty, the country’s first. That’s the story according to texts written long after the fact, and many Chinese believe their civilization started with emperor Yu. But archaeologists have been unable to find convincing evidence for either the flood or the Xia dynasty itself.
Now, an international team of scientists drawn from the fields of archaeology, anthropology, seismology, and geology have gathered disparate evidence from ancient texts, sedimentary deposits, earthquake-triggered landslides, and skeletons in collapsed cave dwellings to craft a scenario presented this week in Science that they claim supports the legend of a great flood and hints that the Xia dynasty might be real. If the findings hold up, they could lend credence to early historical texts and help resolve a long-running debate over the origins of China and its people.
It is “a groundbreaking study,” says Qingwei Sun, an archaeologist at Peking University in Beijing who was not involved in the work. Still, “more data is needed [for the findings] to be widely accepted,” he says.
The paper was nearly a decade in the making. In spring 2007, the study’s lead author, geologist Qinglong Wu, was working as a postdoc at the China Earthquake Administration’s Institute of Geology in Beijing, when his team found ancient lakebed sediments in the Jishi Gorge at the upper reaches of the Yellow River, about 1300 kilometers west of Beijing. They speculated that at some point a lake had formed in the gorge behind rubble from a landslide. If that dam gave away, they reasoned, it would have caused a major flood.
Following a hunch that came during a sleepless night in July 2008, Wu traveled 25 kilometers downstream from the gorge, where a major earthquake had destroyed numerous cave dwellings in a Neolithic settlement called Lajia. Subsequently, a thick layer of mud engulfed the ruins and the victims, preserving them for discovery in the 1990s. Wu found that the Lajia mud matched material from Jishi Gorge, suggesting that the same earthquake that had destroyed the dwellings had also triggered the upstream landslide that set the stage for the flood. Because the sediment was quite different from what would have been washed into the ruins by rainstorms, “the earthquake and flood must have occurred in the same year,” says Darryl Granger, a geologist at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, who is a co-author of the paper.
At that point, Wu began thinking that this event could be the basis for China’s great flood legend. “I didn’t tell others because it would invite laughter,” he says. Instead, he quietly gathered evidence from lake deposits in the gorge and flood sediments downstream, and reached out to specialists around the world to help him interpret the data. The team concluded that the landslide created a dam 200 meters high that choked off the mighty Yellow for 6 to 9 months. The rising water finally overtopped the rubble and then quickly washed it away, causing a torrent that could have been among the largest floods of the Holocene epoch, Granger says. It is difficult to determine when ancient floods happened, but radiocarbon dating of the Lajia human remains pegged the catastrophes to about 1900 B.C.E.
The massive flood “provides us with a tantalizing hint that the Xia dynasty might really have existed,” says David Cohen, an archaeologist and co-author at National Taiwan University in Taipei. The devastating flood could have inundated settlements even a thousand or more kilometers downstream, he says, and created chaos from which a new political order emerged. This sequence of events neatly fits the legend of Yu controlling the flooding by dredging channels to confine the Yellow River and its tributaries. This feat, the ancient texts say, allowed him to claim a mandate as the first emperor of the Xia dynasty.
The timing is curiously coincidental. Around 1900 B.C.E., Cohen says, Chinese society was transitioning from the Neolithic to the Bronze age. The date also correlates with what is called the Erlitou culture, which is known from palace buildings and bronze smelting workshops discovered near Zhengzhou, about 2500 kilometers downstream from Jishi Gorge. Many scholars have argued that Erlitou is a manifestation of the elusive Xia dynasty, but a link is not firmly established.
Nevertheless, with hard evidence of a catastrophic flood occurring at a time of social and political change, “It’s an amazing story of all these different lines of evidence coming together,” Cohen says. “If the great flood really happened, then the Xia dynasty likely happened, too,” he concludes.
“It’s a thought-provoking piece of work,” agrees Tristram Kidder, an archaeologist at Washington University in St. Louis in Missouri, who works on several sites on the lower Yellow River. “They’ve done a great job showing that there was a major, catastrophic flood.”
But Haiwang Liu, an archaeologist at the Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology in Zhengzhou, China, who collaborates with Kidder, says that at their sites in the lower Yellow, “no hard physical evidence of great floods during that time has been found.” And Lothar von Falkenhausen, an archaeologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, cautions against “proposing too direct a linkage between such environmental events with semimythical accounts recorded in texts of much later date.”
The new paper’s findings are also at odds with other recent studies, which have proposed alternative explanations for both the Jishi Gorge deposits and the Lajia sediment, says Wenxiang Wu, a geographer at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’s Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research in Beijing. He adds that recent radiocarbon dating refinements have suggested the Erlitou culture thrived between 1750 B.C.E. and 1530 B.C.E.—much later than the proposed new date for the Xia dynasty. The paper “needs more supporting evidence,” for its claims regarding a great flood and the Xia dynasty, Wenxiang Wu concludes.
Qinglong Wu, now at Nanjing Normal University, acknowledges the paper is certain to stir up several long-simmering controversies. But in trying to make sense of disparate historical and physical evidence “our data involves fewer contradictions” than alternative explanations, he says.
One point all agree on is the need for further study. Finding evidence for a great flood along the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River “would undoubtedly strengthen the persuasiveness of the paper,” Sun says. Wu’s team “sets out a hypothesis we can follow up—it gives us something to look for,” Kidder says.